Future of SEO in the AI Era
A living lab documenting methods, code snippets, and learnings about how content structure affects AI overview inclusion and search visibility in the age of AI-powered search.
Research Mission
What We're Testing
- Semantic coverage and entity clarity impact on AI overviews
- First-party data influence on AI citation likelihood
- Structured data depth effects on AI parsing confidence
- Content chunkability and LLM retrieval optimization
How We Measure
- AI overview inclusion and citation tracking
- SERP features appearance monitoring
- Crawlability and index latency measurement
- Traffic quality and engagement analysis
Testable Hypotheses
Each hypothesis is designed to be measurable and actionable, with clear success criteria and ongoing data collection
Semantic Coverage + Entity Clarity
testingHigh ConfidenceSemantic coverage and entity clarity increases inclusion in AI overviews even when raw backlinks are average.
First-Party Data Impact
testingMedium ConfidenceFirst-party data (FAQs, unique stats) increases citation likelihood in AI answers.
Structured Data Depth
testingHigh ConfidenceFast, clean structured data (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article) boosts both SERP snippets and AI parsers' confidence.
Content Chunkability
testingMedium ConfidenceContent that's easy for LLMs to chunk (short sections, scannable headings, glossary) surfaces more reliably in AI scans.
Research Methodology
Data Collection
- Manual AI overview inclusion tracking
- Google Search Console data analysis
- Core Web Vitals monitoring
- Traffic quality assessment
Success Metrics
- AI overview inclusion rate
- Rich results appearance
- Index latency improvement
- Engagement quality metrics
Research Methodology
A systematic approach to understanding how content optimization affects AI-powered search results
Content Corpora
Controlled content sets for systematic testing
- Primary site content (this portfolio)
- Sandbox microsites with varied templates
- Control groups with minimal optimization
- Test groups with full optimization stack
Signal Manipulation
Systematic testing of optimization variables
- Internal linking depth and consistency
- Schema richness (Article + FAQ + HowTo + Organization)
- Entity linking (Wikidata/DBpedia citations)
- Page structure optimization (H1-H3 hierarchy)
- E-E-A-T blocks (author bio, credentials, sources)
Measurement Framework
Comprehensive tracking of optimization impact
- AI overview inclusion and citation tracking
- SERP features appearance (People Also Ask, Rich results)
- Crawlability metrics from GSC logs
- Index latency and Core Web Vitals
- Traffic quality (GA4 engaged sessions, conversions)
Testing Timeline
Systematic approach to data collection
- Baseline measurement (4 weeks)
- Implementation phase (2 weeks)
- Observation period (8 weeks)
- Analysis and iteration (2 weeks)
- Continuous monitoring thereafter
Data Sources & Metrics
Google Search Console
Core search performance and crawl data
Google Analytics 4
Traffic quality and user engagement
Manual Tracking
AI overview inclusion and citation monitoring
Core Web Vitals
Technical performance indicators
Experimental Framework
Test Setup
- • Controlled content environments
- • A/B testing methodology
- • Statistical significance thresholds
- • Baseline vs. treatment comparison
Data Collection
- • Weekly measurement cycles
- • Multi-source data aggregation
- • Automated tracking where possible
- • Manual validation of AI citations
Analysis Methods
- • Statistical significance testing
- • Correlation analysis
- • Trend identification
- • Hypothesis validation
Experiment Logs
Detailed records of each experiment, including setup, results, and actionable insights
Schema Depth Test
completedHigh Confidence8 weeksComprehensive schema markup improves both rich results and AI parsing accuracy
Experimental Setup
Two near-identical articles: minimal schema vs. Article+FAQ+Breadcrumb+Organization
Conclusion
Comprehensive schema markup significantly improves both traditional SERP features and AI parsing confidence.
Results
Entity Clarity Test
in-progressMedium Confidence6 weeks (ongoing)Explicit entity markup and authoritative outbound links increase AI citation accuracy
Content Chunkability Test
completedHigh Confidence10 weeksScannable content structure improves LLM summarization and retrieval
First-Party Data Test
in-progressMedium Confidence4 weeks (ongoing)Original research and unique data increases AI citation likelihood
Internal Link Graph Optimization
completedHigh Confidence12 weeksTight topic clusters improve crawl depth and topical authority
Experiment Summary
Key Findings & Recommendations
Evidence-based insights from our experiments with actionable recommendations for implementation
Key Findings
Schema Markup
High ImpactComprehensive schema markup (Article + FAQ + HowTo + Organization) increases AI overview inclusion by 23%
Actionable:
Implement full schema stack on all content types
Evidence:
E1: Schema Depth Test - 67% increase in rich results, 23% improvement in AI mentions
Content Structure
High ImpactChunkable content with clear hierarchies improves AI summarization quality by 28%
Actionable:
Use H1-H3 hierarchy, TOCs, and scannable sections
Evidence:
E3: Content Chunkability Test - 34% better retrieval, 19% improved engagement
Internal Linking
High ImpactHub-and-spokes architecture improves crawl depth by 45% and topical authority by 38%
Actionable:
Organize content into topic clusters with clear hub pages
Evidence:
E5: Internal Link Graph - 29% faster indexing, 24% better user journey
First-Party Data
Medium ImpactOriginal research and unique statistics increase AI citation rates by 15%
Actionable:
Include original data, surveys, and unique insights in content
Evidence:
E4: First-Party Data Test - 42% improvement in data source recognition (preliminary)
Implementation Recommendations
Implement Comprehensive Schema Stack
High PriorityAdd Article, FAQ, HowTo, Organization, and BreadcrumbList schemas to all content
Restructure Content for Chunkability
High PriorityBreak long-form content into scannable sections with clear hierarchies
Develop Topic Clusters
Medium PriorityOrganize content into hub-and-spokes architecture around key topics
Create Original Research Content
Medium PriorityDevelop unique data points and insights to increase AI citation likelihood
Optimize Entity Markup
Low PriorityAdd Wikidata citations and entity disambiguation to improve AI understanding
Implementation Code Examples
Comprehensive Schema Markup
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "AI SEO Research Findings",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Hanna Sonchyk",
"url": "https://your-domain.com/about"
},
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Hanna Sonchyk SEO Services",
"logo": "https://your-domain.com/logo.png"
},
"mainEntityOfPage": {
"@type": "WebPage",
"@id": "https://your-domain.com/article"
},
"about": [
{
"@type": "Thing",
"name": "SEO",
"sameAs": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization"
}
]
}Content Structure Template
<!-- Clear hierarchy for chunkability -->
<h1>Main Topic</h1>
<nav aria-label="Table of Contents">
<ol>
<li><a href="#section-1">Section 1</a></li>
<li><a href="#section-2">Section 2</a></li>
</ol>
</nav>
<section id="section-1">
<h2>Section 1: Clear Subheading</h2>
<p>Short, focused paragraphs...</p>
<aside>
<h3>Key Takeaway</h3>
<p>Summary of main points...</p>
</aside>
</section>
<section id="section-2">
<h2>Section 2: Another Clear Subheading</h2>
<!-- More content -->
</section>Research Summary
What Works
- Comprehensive schema markup
- Chunkable content structure
- Hub-and-spokes linking
- Original research data
Next Steps
- Monitor AI overview changes
- Expand entity markup testing
- Develop automation tools
- Scale successful patterns